The arbitral awards are final and binding yet may be challenged before national courts. Generally, the extent and scope of judicial review and reasons that seek to set aside the award are determined in the national law of the parties or international instruments. Is this agreement valid if the parties change the scope of judicial review by the national courts? Depending on whether this change is related to exclusion, limitation or extension of judicial review, legal systems have different approaches. Except in cases where the agreement of the parties is contrary to public order, in other situations the free will of the parties must be respected. New approaches on the initiative of the parties in the administration of proceedings and the contractualisation of justice reinforce this doctrine.
· شهبازینیا، مرتضی، محمد عیسایی تفرشی و حسین علمی؛ «مفهوم نظم عمومی در حقوق بینالملل خصوصی و جایگاه آن در داوری تجاری بینالمللی»، فصلنامه حقوق، دوره 43، شماره 1، 1392.
· غمامی، مجید و حسن محسنی؛ «اصل ابتکار عمل خصوصی عمل اصحاب دعوا در دادرسی مدنی و استثناها و قیدهای آن»، فصلنامه حقوق، دوره 42، شماره 1، 1391.
· مافی، همایون و محمدحسین تقیپور؛ «ماهیت حقوقی نهاد داوری»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، سال ششم، شماره 21، زمستان 1396.
· مقصودی، رضا؛ «توافق بر دادگاه صالح در قراردادهای بینالمللی: توجیه و نقد رویهقضایی»، فصلنامه رأی: مطالعات آرای قضایی، شماره 11، تابستان 1394.
· نریمانی زمانآبادی، سیدمهدی و محمدتقی فخلعی؛ «بررسی تناقض نمایی قاعده الشروط لا یوزع علیها الثمن با قاعده للشرط قسط منالثمن»، آموزههای فقه مدنی، شماره 11، 1394.
ب. انگلیسی
- Theses
Mickus, Pranas Mykolas, “Possibility of Expanding Judicial Review Mechanism in Arbitration by Party Agreement”, LL.M. Short Thesis, Central European University, 2014.
Onyeisi, Levi, “Party Autonomy and Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements and Awards as the Basis of Arbitration”, Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester, 2014.
- Articles
Ahdab, AH El, “The Draft Arbitration Law of the United Arab Emirates”, International, Journal of Arab Arbitration, vol. 2(1), 2010.
Baizeau, D., “Commentary on Chapter 12 PILA, Art. 192, Section X Waiver of Annulment”, in M. Arroyo (ed.), Arbitration in Switzerland, Wolters Kluwer, 2013.
Castro, Claudio de, ‘Panama’, in The Arbitration Review of the Americas, Global Arbitration Review, 2015.
Hulea, Dan C., “Contracting to Expand the Scope of Review of Foreign Arbitral Awards: An American Perspective”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, vol. 29, 2003.
Scherer, Maxi, “Effects of Foreign Judgments Relating to International Arbitral Awards: Is the ‘Judgment Route’ the Wrong Road?”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 4, no. 3, 2013.
Maxi Scherer, “The Fate of Parties’ Agreements on Judicial Review of Awards: A Comparative and Normative Analysis of Party-Autonomy at the Post-Award Stage”, Arbitration International, vol. 32, iss. 3, September 2016.
Wolff, R., “Party Autonomy to Agree on a Non-Final Arbitration”, ASA Bulletin, 2008.
Rezaee, A. (2020). Party Autonomy in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards. International Law Review, 37(62), 307-334. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2019.63624.1266
MLA
Ali Rezaee. "Party Autonomy in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards". International Law Review, 37, 62, 2020, 307-334. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2019.63624.1266
HARVARD
Rezaee, A. (2020). 'Party Autonomy in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards', International Law Review, 37(62), pp. 307-334. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2019.63624.1266
VANCOUVER
Rezaee, A. Party Autonomy in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards. International Law Review, 2020; 37(62): 307-334. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2019.63624.1266