Reviewers Guide
Dear Reviewer
Please before reviewing an article register in the system and log in with your username and password.
In your personal page there are three options:
1. New papers requiring reviewing
2. Papers under review
3. Reviewed papers
If you accept manuscripts sent by editors to review, these papers will appear in the second option.
Articles that their judgment has been completed are is displayed in the third option. In this case it is necessary to complete the online form for evaluation.
It is also possible that comments be sent as a separate file.
Please find below an example of Articles Assessment Form:
Articles Assessment Form
1. What is the Type of the article ?
Research/original(5) Review (2) Short paper(2) Case Study (2) Methodology(2)
2. Do you know of similar works of this article in Persain? (If yes, please name them.)
Yes No
3. Does the paper offers new scientific findings? Yes (5) No (0)
4. Does the study contains two features of originality and innovation? Yes (5) No (0)
5. How do you see the article in the scientific sense?
Very good (5) Good (3) Average (2) Poor (0)
6. How do you see the article on the induction of concepts?
Very good (5) Good (3) Average (2) Poor (0)
7. Are the references used in the paper are cited from valid sources?
Yes (5) No (0)
8. Does the paper need to be edited?
Yes (1) No (5)
9. How do you assess the quantity of resources?
Very good (5) Good (3) poor (1)
10. Does the article captioned additions are necessary? Please mention the example.
Yes (1) No (5)
11. With regard to all aspects what is your opinion about the publication of the article [5]
Acceptable (5) Not acceptable (0) With the changes mentioned above will be accepted. (1)
12. If the article is acceptable please mention your reasons briefly.
13. If the paper is not acceptable please mention your main reasons.
Total score
Reviewers Duties