The ADR rules of the International Chamber of Commerce have recently come into force, substituting rules of conciliation which along with arbitration used to be employed as a settlement procedure for a long time. The new ADR rules seem to be as flexible as possible so that they allow the parties to resolve their dispute in a manner convenient to them.Compared to arbitration, ADR tend to be more expeditious and less expensive. A facilitating person called “the Neutral" who is appointed either by the parties themselves or by the ICC, attempts to bring the parties to a compromise, through a procedure that they consider to be the most appropriate one.
متن مقررات هنوز در ایران انتشار نیافته اما در پایگاه اینترنتی اتاق بازرگانی بینالمللی به آدرس زیر موجود است:
Tavassoli Jahromi, M. (2001). An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the ICC New Rules . International Law Review, 19(26-27), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.22066/cilamag.2002.18077
MLA
Tavassoli Jahromi, M. "An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the ICC New Rules ", International Law Review, 19, 26-27, 2001, 365–382. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2002.18077
HARVARD
Tavassoli Jahromi, M. (2001). 'An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the ICC New Rules ', International Law Review, 19(26-27), pp. 365–382. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2002.18077
CHICAGO
Tavassoli Jahromi, M., "An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the ICC New Rules ." International Law Review, 19 26-27 (2001): 365–382, doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2002.18077
VANCOUVER
Tavassoli Jahromi M. An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the ICC New Rules . International Law Review. 2001;19(26-27):365–382 (In Persian). doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2002.18077
