Nowadays, great importance has been attached to the contractual terms especially the agreement on choice of court in international commercial contracts for possible disputes. Although, considering the party autonomy principle and parties’ interests, the agreement on the court that will have jurisdiction over the case is acceptable and this agreement obviously is valid in some legal systems and also in international instruments, Iranian Law casts serious doubt on it. Lack of certain laws and deficiency of case law in Iran have induced this uncertainty. The confusion in the clause to the exclusion of Iranian courts’ jurisdiction is more serious. This article using descriptive-analytical method and focusing on some Acts and Cases in legal system of Iran indicates that in Iranian Law, the agreement on jurisdiction that introduces the Iranian courts as competent court is acceptable. Accordingly, Iranian Law operates like many other legal systems. Nevertheless, it deals with more restrictions on the exclusion of Iranian courts’ jurisdiction clause. This clause is valid unless the subject of dispute is related to issues that the Iranian courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
ـــــــــــ ؛ مدی حق القضاء المصری فی التخلی عن اختصاصه فیالمنازعات المدنیه و التجاریه، 2014، قابل دسترسی در: http://cutt.us/uYLIm آخرین بازدید در 13 اسفند 97.
عبدالله، عزالدین؛ القانون الدولی الخاص، الجزء الثانی، الطبعه التاسعه، الهیئه العامه للکتاب، 1986.
محمد خلیل، خالد عبدالفتاح؛ تعاظم دور الاراده فی القانون الدولی الخاص، الطبعه الاولی، دار النهضه العربیه، 2014.
ج. انگلیسی
- Book
Brand, Ronald A., Herrup, Paul, The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Commentary and Documents, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
-Articles
Ahmed, Mukarrum and Beaumont, Paul, “Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Some Issues on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and Its Relationship with the Brussels I Recast Especially Anti-Suit Injunctions, Concurrent Proceedings and the Implications of BREXIT”, Centre for Private International Law Aberdeen Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 5, 2016.
Clermont, Kevin M., “Governing Law on Forum-Selection Agreements”, Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 66, 2015.
- Instruments
ALI/ UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure.
Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1968.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (‘Brussels I’).
Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, 2005.
The Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast) (‘Brussels I Recast’).
Kabry,M. and Ansari,A. (2020). Feasibility of Agreement on Courts Exclusion of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction in Iranian Law. International Law Review, 37(63), 343-371. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2020.104979.1677
MLA
Kabry,M. , and Ansari,A. . "Feasibility of Agreement on Courts Exclusion of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction in Iranian Law", International Law Review, 37, 63, 2020, 343-371. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2020.104979.1677
HARVARD
Kabry M., Ansari A. (2020). 'Feasibility of Agreement on Courts Exclusion of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction in Iranian Law', International Law Review, 37(63), pp. 343-371. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2020.104979.1677
CHICAGO
M. Kabry and A. Ansari, "Feasibility of Agreement on Courts Exclusion of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction in Iranian Law," International Law Review, 37 63 (2020): 343-371, doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2020.104979.1677
VANCOUVER
Kabry M., Ansari A. Feasibility of Agreement on Courts Exclusion of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction in Iranian Law. International Law Review, 2020; 37(63): 343-371. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2020.104979.1677
