International Law Review

International Law Review

Corporal Punishments from the Perspective of International Criminal Court in Al-Hassan Case

Document Type : academic

Authors
Mohammad hasan Maldar 1
Abodolreza Javan jaafari bojnordi 2
Seyyed Mohammad javad Sadati 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
10.22066/cilamag.2023.701345
Abstract
“Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud”, one of the leaders of the Ansar al-Din organization in Mali’s civil war, is now facing two charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the International Criminal Court.The implementation of corporal punishments is among his brutal acts. In this respect, we are facing this question that how the criminalization of corporal punishment should be analyzed from the court statute perspective? It is also necessary to unravel the mystery of how to rethink the corporal punishment system in Islamic countries in the light of the recent case. Present research concludes that the nature of corporal punishment implemented by Al-Hassan is compatible with the actus reus and mens rea of crimes against humanity and war crimes. Therefore, the implementation of corporal punishment by Islamic countries cannot be considered an international crime unless there are defined matching elements. However, in line with rethinking corporal punishments, they should come up with a message-oriented perception about the discussed case and pay attention to the expressive function of the court. With regard to various principles and jurisprudence rules such as Mulazeme rule (combination of reason and Sharia) and the Rule of Nafy Sabil (Denying the Domination of Unbelievers over Believers), there will be no doubt that this is an important issue. The importance of this issue and an urgent need for a solution increases with the international human rights organizations’ reactions and protests, considering Islamic governments in the same category as Takfiri groups in the international eyes, as well as the growth of the ohenomenon of Islamophobia.
Keywords
War Crime
Crime against Humanity
Lashing Punishment
Mulazeme Rule
The Rule of Nafy Sabil (Denying the Domination of Unbelievers Over Believers)

  1.  

    Books

    1. Bayrakli, Enes, Hafez, Farid (eds.), The State of Islamophobia in Europe, SETA, Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research, 2016.
    2. Chaitidu, Eleni, Recent Developments in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court – Part 2,
    3. Chauzal and Thibault van Damme, The roots of Mali’s conflict Moving beyond the 2012 Crisis, Clingendael Institute,

     

     

    Articles

    1. Atnashev, V. R., “Impact of Islamophobia and Human Rights”, Middle East Review of Public Administration (MERPA), 2, Issue 1, 2016.
    2. Hola, Barbora, Nyseth Brehm, Hollie, “Punishing Genocide: A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Sentencing Laws and Practices at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), Rwandan Domestic Courts, and Gacaca Courts,” Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, vol. 10, Issue 3, 2016.

     

    - Theses

    1. Steindal, Marius, ISIS Totalitarian Ideology and Discourse: An Analysis of the Dabiq Magazine Discourse, Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Master Thesis, 2015.

     

    ت. وبسایت­های اینترنتی

    1. مرتضوی، محسن؛ درس الفائق (سیره عقلاییه/اقسام سیره مستحدثه /امکان عدم ردع شارع). 8/7/1399، (در دسترس در تاریخ 11/11/ 1400)

    https://www.eshia.ir/feqh/archive/text/mortazavi_mohsen/alfaeq1/99/99070/

    1. مرکز حقوق کیفری بین‌المللی ایران، «اولین پروندة تخریب میراث فرهنگی در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی». 04/07/1397

    http://www.icicl.org/details.asp?id=322

    1. مرکز حقوق کیفری بین‌المللی ایران، تأیید شدت­مندی و قابلیت پذیرش پروندة «الحسن» از سوی شعبه تجدیدنظر دیوان کیفری بین­الملل، به آدرس:

    http://www.icicl.org/details.asp?id=571

    1. Batchelor, Tom, “ISIS Cuts Off Hands and Feet of 'Livestock Thieves' in Latest Sickening Propaganda Video”, 2 July 2015, available at: <https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/588412/Islamic-State-terror-group- cuts-off-hands-feet-thieves-Syria.>, last seen 1 February 2022.
    2. Guardian, “Stoning in Iran: Brutality Pure and Simple”, 9 July 2010, available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jul/09/ stoning-death-penalty-iran-editorial>.
    3. Guest Author, “10 Horrifying and Cringeworthy Corporal Punishments”, 12 August 2016, available at: <http://www.toptenz.net/ 10-horrifying-and-cringeworthy- corporal-punishments.php>.
    4. ICC (A), “Al Hassan Case: ICC Appeals Chamber Confirms the Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Admissibility and the Sufficient Gravity of the Case”, 19 February 2020, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx? name=pr1515>.
    5. ICC (B), “Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, at the Opening of the Trial in the Case against Mr. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud”, 14 July 2020, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name =200714-otp-statement-al-hassan>.
    6. ICC (C), “Opening of the Trial in the Al Hassan Case: Practical Information”, 9 July 2020, <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx? name=ma254>.
    7. ICC (A). “Al Hassan Case: ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I Confirms Charges of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity and Commits Suspect to Trial”, 30 September 2019, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/ item.aspx? name=pr1483#_blank>.
    8. ICC (B). “Décision relative à la requête de la défense aux fins d’autorisation d’interjeter appel de la Décision relative à la confirmation des charges et transmission du dossier à la présidence en vertu de la règle 129 du Règlement de procédure et de preuve”, 18 November 2019, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo= ICC-01/12-01/18-498- Red2#_blank>.
    9. ICC, “Situation in Mali: Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud Surrendered to the ICC on Charges of Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes in Timbuktu”, 31 March 2018, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1376#_blank>.
    10. Info Note 2, “Democratic Republic of the Congo 1993-2003 UN Mapping Report”, available at: <https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ Countries/CD/FS-2_Crimes_Final.pdf>.

     

    - International Criminal Cases

    1. AFRC Trial, The Prosecutor v. Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara, and Santigie Borbor, Appeals Chamber, 22 February 2008, Case No. SCSL-2004-16-A, available at: <http://www.rscsl.org/ Documents/ Decisions/AFRC/Appeal/675/SCSL-04-16-A-675.pdf>.
    2. ICC, Le Procureur c. Al Hassan, La Chambre Préliminaire I, 13 November 2019, No. ICC-01/12-01/18, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_ 06927.pdf >.
    3. ICC, The Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud, Case Information Sheet, ICC-01/12-01/18, available at: <https://www.icc-cpi.int/CaseInformationSheets/al-hassanEng.pdf>.
    4. ICTR, The Prosecutor v. Clement Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana, Trial Chamber II, 21 May 1999, Judgement, Case No. ICTR-95-1-T. available at: <https://ucr.irmct.org/LegalRef/CMSDocStore/Public/English/ Judgement/NotIndexable/ICTR-95-01/MSC15929R0000620214.pdf>.
    5. ICTR, The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana; Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, Appeals Chamber, 28 November 2007, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, available at: <https://ucr.irmct.org/LegalRef/CMSDocStore/ Public/English/Judgement/NotIndexable/ICTR-99-52/MSC31299 pdf>.
    6. ICTR, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Judgment, 2 Sep 1998, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, available at: <https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/ unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-96-4/trial-judgements/en/980902.pdf>.
    7. ICTY, Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Judgement, 10 December 1998, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, available at: <https://www.icty.org/x/cases/ furundzija/tjug/en/fur-tj981210e.pdf>.
    8. ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Judgement, 16 November 1998, Case No. IT-96-21-T, available at: <https://www.icty.org/x/ cases/mucic/tjug/en/981116_judg_en.pdf>.
    9. ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić, Zdravko Mucić, Hazim Delić and Esad Landžom, Judgment, 16 November 1998, Case No. IT-96-21-T, 16 Nov 1998, available at: <https://www.icty.org/x/cases/mucic/tjug/ en/981116_judg_en.pdf>.

  • Receive Date 26 May 2022
  • Revise Date 24 December 2022
  • Accept Date 23 January 2023