پروتکل شماره ۱۵ و اصلاح نظام اروپایی حقوق بشر

الف) فارسی

ـ کتاب

• زمانی، سید‌قاسم، امیرساعد وکیل و پوریا عسکری؛ نهادها و سازوکارهای منطقه‌ای حمایت از حقوق بشر، شهر دانش، 1386.

ـ مقاله

• سادات‌اخوی، سید‌علی؛ «پروتکل شماره 14 و اصلاح نظام نظارتی کنوانسیون اروپایی حقوق بشر»، مجله دانشکده حقوق‌وعلوم‌سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، شماره 70، زمستان 1384.

ب) انگلیسی

- Books

• Diego Rodríguez-Pinzón and Claudia Martin, “The Inter-American Human Rights System: Selected Examples of Its Supervisory Work”, in: Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law, Edited by Sarah Joseph, Edward Elgar, 2010.
• Francisco Forrest Martin, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Treaties, Cases and Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
• G. Martinico and O. Pollicino, The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws,A Comparative Constitutional Perspective,Europa Law Publishing, 2010.
• H. Petzold, “The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity”, in R. St. J. Macdonald, F. Matscher and H. Petzold (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
• Howard Charles Yourow, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence, Martinus Nijhoff. The Hague, 1996.
• Letsas, George, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention of Human Right, Oxford University Press, 2007.

- Articles

• Benvenisti, Eyal, “Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards”, Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 31, No. 4, 1999.
• Eva Berms, “The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights”, (1996)Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 56, 1993.
• Federico Fabbrini, “The Constitutionalization of International Law: A Comparative Federal Prespective”, European Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 6, Issue 2.
• Helfer L., Slaughter A. M., “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication”, 107 Yale Law Journal, 1997.
• Howard Charles Yourow, “The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence”, Connecticut Journal of International Law, vol. 3, 1987,
• J. A. Sweeney, “Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 54, Issue 2, 2005.
• Jan Kratochvíl, “The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights”, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, vol. 3/29, 2011.
• Janneke Gerards, “Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine”, European Law Journal, vol. 17, No. 1, January 2011.
• Lookwood, Finn & Jubisky, “Working Paper for Committee of Experts on Limitation Provisions”, 7 HumanRights Quarterly, 1984.
• Paolo G. Carozza, “Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law”, American Journal of International Law, 2003, vol. 97, No.1.
• Robert Spano, “Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasburg in the Age of Subsidiarity”, HumanRights Law Review, vol.4, Issue 3, 2014.
• Spielmann Dean, “Whither the Margin of Appreciation?” UCL Current Legal Problems (CLP) Lecture, 2014, p. 11, available at: www.coe.int/Document/Speech-20140320-London-ENG.pdf (last visited February. 29, 2016).
• Spielmann Dean, “Allowing the Right Margin: The European Court of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waver or Subsidiarity of European Review?” Max Plank Institute for Comparative Public and International Law, Heidelberg, 13 December 2013.
• Steven Greer,The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention of Human Rights, Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files, No. 17, 2000.
• Tümay, Mura, “The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Developed by the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, Ankara Law Review, 2008, vol. 5 No. 2.

- Documents

• Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights: ECHR)
• Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental.
• Explanatory Report Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
• Opinion of the Court on Draft Protocol No. 15 to the European Convention on Human Rights, 6 February 2013.
• Joint NGO Statement: “Protocol No. 15 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights Must Not Result in Weakening of Human Rights Protection”, 24 June 2013.
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.