مجله حقوقی بین المللی

مجله حقوقی بین المللی

جنگ ۱۲ روزه و مساعدت آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی در ارتکاب تجاوز: تحلیلی ذیل ماده ۱۴ طرح مسئولیت سازمان‌های بین‌المللی ۲۰۱۱

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق تجارت و سرمایه‌گذاری بین‌المللی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
10.22066/cilamag.2025.2070209.2802
چکیده
چکیده
تضاد میان بهره‌برداری سیاسی رژیم اسرائیل از قطعنامة شمارة GOV/2025/38 شورای حکام آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی برای توجیه تجاوز نظامی علیه ایران، و اظهارات متعاقب مدیرکل آژانس که اساس این توجیه را تضعیف می‌کرد، این نهاد را در موقعیت حقوقی پیچیده‌ای قرار می‌دهد. این وضعیت، این پرسش را در چارچوب حقوق مسئولیت بین‌المللی مطرح می‌کند که آیا آژانس عملاً ارتکاب عمل تجاوزکارانه توسط رژیم اسرائیل را تسهیل کرده است؟ این مقاله با هدف پاسخ به این پرسش، مسئولیت آژانس را ذیل ماده ۱۴ طرح مسئولیت سازمان‌های بین‌المللی ۲۰۱۱ تحلیل می‌کند. فرضیه آن است که مسئولیت آژانس به دلیل مساعدت دوگانه (سیاسی و عملیاتی) در ارتکاب عمل متخلفانة بینالمللی، علم به اوضاع و احوال، و نقض تعهدات ذاتی خود، محقق است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که با احراز ارکان سه‌گانة ماده ۱۴، مسئولیت بین‌المللی آژانس در تسهیل تجاوز نظامی، قابل اثبات است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The 12-Day War and the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Aid or Assistance in the Commission of Aggression: An Analysis under Article 14 of the 2011 Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations

نویسندگان English

Seyyed Mohammad Amin Alavi Shahri 1
Hoorieh Hosseini Akbarnejad 2
1 Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English


Abstract
The contradiction between the Israeli regime’s political exploitation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors’ Resolution GOV/2025/38 to justify its military aggression against Iran, and the subsequent statements by the Agency’s Director General which undermined the very basis of this justification, places the organization in a complex legal position. This situation raises the question, within the framework of international responsibility law, of whether the IAEA has effectively facilitated the Israeli regime’s commission of the act of aggression. Aiming to answer this question, this article analyzes the IAEA’s responsibility under Article 14 of the 2011 Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (DARIO). The hypothesis is that the Agency’s responsibility is established due to its dual assistance (political and operational), its knowledge of the circumstances, and the violation of its own inherent obligations. The research is conducted using a qualitative method with a legal-doctrinal analysis approach. The findings indicate that by fulfilling the tripartite conditions of Article 14, the IAEA’s international responsibility for facilitating military aggression can be established.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Responsibility of International Organizations
Aid or Assistance in the Commission of a Wrongful Act
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Act of Aggression
Article 14 of the DARIO
Due Diligence
منابع:
الف. فارسی
ـ کتاب
1.        زمانی، سید قاسم. حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد دوم). تهران: انتشارات شهر دانش، ۱۴۰۱.
2.        کرافورد، جیمز. حقوق مسئولیت بین‌المللی (قواعد عمومی). ترجمه: علیرضا ابراهیم‌گل. تهران: نشر سنگلج، ۱۳۹۵.
3.        کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل سازمان ملل متحد. حقوق مسئولیت سازمان‌های بین‌المللی: ترجمه: متن و شرح مواد طرح کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل سازمان ملل متحد. ترجمه: عبدالله عابدینی و خلیل روزگاری. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی، ۱۳۹۸.
 
ـ مقاله
1.        الهویی نظری، حمید و عقیل محمدی، «نگاهی انتقادی به پیش‌نویس مواد راجع به مسئولیت سازمان‌های بین‌المللی»، مجلة مطالعات حقوقی دانشگاه شیراز ۹، شمارة ۴ (۱۳۹۱).
2.        حدادی، مهدی و بهرام مرادیان، «مفهوم مراقبت بایسته در حقوق بین‌الملل و مقررات گروه ویژة اقدام مالی»، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی ۳۶، شمارة ۶۱ (۱۳۹۸).
3.        حدادی، مهدی و محمد ستایش‌پور، «دامنة اعمال مسئولیت بین‌المللی اشتقاقی: مطالعۀ تطبیقی نظام مسئولیت دولت‌ها و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی»، دوفصلنامۀ علمی حقوق تطبیقی ۸، شمارة ۱ (۱۴۰۰).
4.        سیفی، جمال و نسیم زرگری‌نژاد، «ملاحظاتی انتقادی بر یکسان‌انگاری ارکان تحقق مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت‌ها و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی»، فصلنامة تحقیقات حقوقی ۲۵، شمارة ۹۸ (۱۴۰۱).
5.         _______________________، «ملاحظاتی انتقادی بر مسئولیت دولت و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در قبال عمل متخلفانۀ دولت یا سازمان بین‌المللی دیگر»، فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران ۵۵، شمارة ۲ (۱۴۰۴).
6.         مؤمنی‌راد، احمد و محمد ستایش‌پور. «دامنۀ مفهومی مسئولیت اشتقاقی سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در حقوق بین‌الملل». فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران ۴۹، شمارة ۳ (۱۳۹۸).
 
ب. انگلیسی
- Books
1.         Boutin, Berenice. “The Potential Role of Due Diligence in Achieving Increased Institutional Accountability and Responsibility in Disaster Management Contexts.” In International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Honour of Hélène Lambert, edited by Vincent Chetail, Noelle De Smet, and Sarah Heathcote, 336-358. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004383401_018.
2.         Crawford, James. State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
3.         Daugirdas, Kristina. “Member States’ Due Diligence Obligations to Supervise International Organizations.” In Due Diligence in International Law, edited by Heike Krieger, Anne Peters, and Leonhard Kreuzer, 248-266. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/ 9780198859942.003.0011.
4.         Dörr, Oliver, and Albrecht Randelzhofer. “Article 2(4).” In The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, edited by Bruno Simma et al., 3rd ed., 200–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acref/9780199580156.001.0001.
5.         Sarooshi, Dan. “Legal Capacity and Powers.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations, edited by Jacob Katz Cogan, Ian Hurd, and Ian Johnstone, 985–1005. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199672369.003.0041.
6.         Webster, Daniel. Letter to Lord Ashburton, August 6, 1842. In British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 30, 195–196. London: James Ridgway and Sons, 1857.
 
- Articles
1.         Almakky, Rawa. “The Role of International Organizations in the Development of International Law: An Analytical Assessment of the United Nations.” International Journal of Law: “Law and World” 9, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.36475/9.4.4.
2.         Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad Salim. “The Role of International Organizations in Promoting Peace and Security in the Middle East.” Journal of Political Studies 31, no. 2 (2024).
3.         Campbell, Ellen, Alice Delemare, and Scarlett M. Evans. “Due Diligence Obligations of International Organizations Under International Law.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 50, no. 2 (2018).
4.         Deeks, Ashley S. “The Legality of Preventive Self-Defense in International Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 40, no. 2 (2000).
5.         Klabbers, Jan. “Reflections on Role Responsibility: The Responsibility of International Organizations for Failing to Act.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejil/chx069.
6.         Mohay, Ágoston, Bence Kis Kelemen, Attila Pánovics, and Norbert Tóth. “The Articles on the Responsibility of International Organisations – Still Up in the Air after More Than a Decade?” Pécs Journal of International and European Law, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15170/ PJIEL.2023.1.3.
7.         Möldner, Mirka. “Responsibility of International Organizations – Introducing the ILC’s DARIO.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-7413_ mpyun_16_011.
8.         Morgun, Valerii. “The Role of International Organizations in The Regulation and Management of The World Economy and Security.” Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management 10, no. 9 (2025). https://doi.org/10.61093/jisem.10.9.e202509.
9.         Okada, Yohei. “Effective Control Test at the Interface Between the Law of International Responsibility and the Law of International Organizations: Managing Concerns Over the Attribution of UN Peacekeepers’ Conduct to Troop-Contributing Nations.” Leiden Journal of International Law 32, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S092215651900015X
 
- Instruments
1.       Charter of the United Nations. (1945).
2.       International Atomic Energy Agency. Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency1956.” https://www.iaea.org/about/statute
 
- Documents
1.        Consequences of the Israeli Military Attack on the Iraqi Nuclear Research Reactor and the Standing Threat to Repeat This Attack. (September 2, 1983) GC(XXVII)/692.” https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/ files/gc/gc27-692_en.pdf.
2.         “International Law Commission. “Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries.” In Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-third Session, 2001.” UN Doc. A/56/10. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/ commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.
3.         “Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, with commentaries.” In Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its Sixty-third session, 2011. UN Doc. A/66/10. https://legal.un.org/ ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf.
4.         Sarooshi, Dan. “Conferral by States of Powers on International Organizations: The Agency Relationship.” Jean Monnet Working Paper 4/03. NYU School of Law, 2003. https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/03/030401.pdf.
5.         Ahlborn, Christiane. “The Rules of International Organizations and the Law of International Responsibility.” Amsterdam Center for International Law Research Paper No. 2011-03. University of Amsterdam, 2011. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1825182.
6.         “United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 66/100, Responsibility of international organizations. UN Doc. A/RES/66/100.” (December 9, 2011).
7.         “United Nations Security Council. Resolution 487 (June 19, 1981).” UN Doc. S/RES/487. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/22225.
8.         “United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 3314 (XXIX), Definition of Aggression.” (December 14, 1974) UN Doc. A/RES/3314(XXIX). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/219655.
 
- Cases
1.         Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 2007, p. 43.
2.         Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania). Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 4.
3.         Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict. Advisory Opinion. I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 66.
4.         Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 14.
 
- Online Sources
1.         Beres, Louis René. “Limited Nuclear War and Israel’s National Strategy.” BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 2,309. Ramat Gan: BESA Center for Strategic Studies, October 1, 2024. https://besacenter.org/limited-nuclear- war-and-israels-national-strategy/
2.         “Did not have any proof of Iran’s effort to move into a nuclear weapon: IAEA Chief.” The Economic Times, June 18, 2025. https://economictimes. indiatimes.com/news/defence/did-not-have-any-proof-of-irans-effort-to-move-into-a-nuclear-weapon-iaea-chief/articleshow/121921748.cms.
3.         Freiberg, Nava. “Israel Calls for Increased International Pressure on Iran Following IAEA Resolution.” The Times of Israel, June 12, 2025. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israel-calls-for-increased- international-pressure-on-iran-following-iaea-resolution/.
4.         Grossi, Rafael Mariano. “Introductory Statement to the Board of Governors.” IAEA.org, November 20, 2024. https://www.iaea.org/ newscenter/statements/iaea-director-generals-introductory-statement- to-the-board-of-governors-20-november-2024.
5.         Statement on the Situation in Iran.” IAEA.org, June 13, 2025. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/statement-on-the-situation-in-iran-13-june-2025.
6.         “IAEA Head Calls for Diplomacy with Iran as Nuclear Activities Advance.” Arms Control Association, January 25, 2024. https://www.armscontrol.org/ blog/2024-01-25/iaea-head-calls-diplomacy-iran-nuclear-activities-advance.
7.         International Commission of Jurists. “Israel’s Attack on Iran Violates International Law, Threatening Peace and Security.” ICJ.org, April 21, 2025. https://www.icj.org/israel-iran-israels-attack-on-iran-violates-international-law-threatening-peace-and-security/.
8.         “Israel Confirms Bombing ‘Syria Nuclear Reactor’ in 2007.” Al Jazeera, March 21, 2018. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/3/21/israel-confirms-bombing-syria-nuclear-reactor-in-2007.
9.         Melman, Yossi, and Dan Raviv. “Three Minutes Over Syria: How Israel Destroyed Assad’s Nuclear Reactor.” The Times of Israel, March 21, 2018. https://www.timesofisrael.com/three-minutes-over-syria-how-israel-destroyed-assads-nuclear-reactor/.
10.     Milanovic, Marko. “Is Israel’s Use of Force Against Iran Justified by Self-Defence?” EJIL: Talk! (blog), April 19, 2025. https://www.ejiltalk.org/ is-israels-use-of-force-against-iran-justified-by-self-defence/.
11.     Netanyahu, Benjamin. “Netanyahu claims historic victory, says ‘we sent Iran’s nuclear program down the drain’.” The Times of Israel, June 24, 2025. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/netanyahu-claims-historic-victory-says-we-sent-irans-nuclear-program-down-the-drain/.
12.     Zamani, Masoud, and Amir Abbas Kiani. “Missiles and Messages: Characterizing the Use of Force between Iran and Israel.” Opinio Juris (blog), July 25, 2025. https://opiniojuris.org/2025/07/25/missiles-and-messages-characterizing-the-use-of-force-between-iran-and-israel/.

  • تاریخ دریافت 09 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 17 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 آبان 1404