منابع:
الف. فارسی
ـ مقاله
1. حبیبی، همایون و سوده شاملو، «نقش دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در توسعة حقوق بینالملل»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی 15، شمارة ۴۱ (1392).
2. پیام قاسمی، «توسعة حقوقی مفهوم «جرایم علیه بشریت» و «جنایت جنگی» در پرتو جنگ غزه و پیگرد حقوقی اسرائیل»، دانشنامة فقه و حقوق تطبیقی ۲، شمارة ۱(1403).
3. میرمحمدی، سیدمصطفی و مهران خمیسیزاده، «مطالعة تطبیقی جایگاه و کارکرد نظرهای فردی (جداگانه، مخالف و اعلامیه) در رویة دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری و نظام داوری حل اختلافات دولت ـ سرمایهگذار»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی 11 شمارة 1 (1399).
https://doi.org/10.22059/jcl.2019.284142.633858دسترسی در ۹ نوامبر ۲۰۲۵ .
4. موسوی، سیدفضلالله، «بررسی حقوقی حملة تجاوزکارانة رژیم صهیونیستی به جمهوری اسلامی ایران». انجمن ایرانی مطالعات سازمان ملل متحد (IAUNS). دسترسی: ۹ نوامبر ۲۰۲۵.
5. قربانیپور، مستوره، لیلا رئیسی و حسین رستمزاد، «مشروعیت عملکرد دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در توسعۀ قواعد حقوق بینالملل»، فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران ۵۳، شمارة ۳ (1402).
6. یادگاریان، فرامرز، محسن محبی و امیرحسین ملکیزاده، «اثبات صلاحیت ماهوی دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در پروندة نقض معاهدة مودت ۱۹۵۵»، نشریة مطالعات بینالمللی ۲۱، شمارة ۱ (۱۴۰۳).
ـ رسانه
1. رضادوست، وحید. «ناظم نظم پریشان: نقش دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در بازسازی روابط ازهمگسیختة بینالمللی»، فایل صوتی نشست، کمیتة جوانان انجمن ایرانی مطالعات سازمان ملل متحد با همکاری خانة اندیشمندان علوم انسانی، ۲۳ اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۴، خانة اندیشمندان علوم انسانی، تهران. دسترسی از طریق کانال تلگرام خانة اندیشمندان علوم انسانی:
ب. انگلیسی
- Books
1. Barnett, Michael. Power in International Politics. New York: Routledge, 2014.
2. Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
3. Cassese, Antonio. International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
4. Crawford, James. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
5. Franck, Thomas M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
6. Gray, Christine. International Law and the Use of Force. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
7. Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
8. Higgins, Rosalyn. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
9. Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
10. McDonald, Caroline. The Role of Judges in International Law Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.
11. Mousavian, Seyed Hossein. Iran and the International Community. New York: Routledge, 2018.
12. Sands, Philippe. East West Street: On the Origins of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2016.
13. Sands, Philippe. Principles of International Environmental Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
14. Schmitt, Michael N., and Liis Vihul. International Law and the Use of Force: Cases and Materials. 3rd ed. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020.
15. Shaw, Malcolm. International Law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- Articles
1. Alston, Philip. “Justice and Human Rights in the Era of Globalization.” Human Rights Quarterly 27, no. 4 (2005).
2. Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. “The Iran–United States Dispute at the ICJ: The Treaty of Amity and Beyond.” American Journal of International Law 113, no. 2 (2019).
3. Byman, Daniel. “Cyber Warfare and Israel’s Covert Campaign Against Iran.” Foreign Affairs (2018).
4. Crawford, James. “The Corfu Channel Case and Contemporary International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, no. 4 (1999).
5. D’Amato, Anthony. “Enforcement Problems in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 73, no. 1 (1979).
6. Ellen O’Connell, Mary. “Silent Invasions: Economic Sanctions as Acts of War.” Journal of Human Rights 15, no. 2 (2016).
7. Gazit, Shlomo. “Israel’s Targeted Killings and International Law: Justification and Legal Challenges.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 19, no. 4 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab029.
8. Glennon, Michael. “The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense.” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 3 (2009).
9. Jonathan, Moses, and Bruno Simma, “Iran v. United States: The Oil Platforms Case and the Use of Force under International Law,” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 2 (2009).
10. Kanstantsin, Kanstantsin D. “The Principle of Consent in the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 8, no. 2 (2017).
11. Meiklejohn, Sarah. “Data Science and International Law: Applications and Challenges.” Journal of International Legal Studies 37, no. 2 (2023).
12. Robinson, Peter. “Definitions of Force in International Law.” International Law Journal 25, no. 1 (2018).
13. Schmitt, Michael N. “International Law and Cyber Operations: Challenges and Responses.” Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 2021.
14. Yoo, John. “Economic Sanctions and Cyber Operations as Instruments of War.” Journal of Conflict Studies 12, no. 3 (2016).
- Instruments
1. Charter of the United Nations (adopted 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945) 1 UNTS XVI.
2. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002) 2187 UNTS 90.
3. Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights between the United States of America and Iran (signed 15 August 1955, entered into force 16 June 1957) 284 UNTS 93.
- Cases
1. Alleged Violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Provisional Measures, Order of 3 October 2018, Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, I.C.J. Reports 2018.
2. Case concerning United States Sanctions (Iran v. United States), 2019
3. Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. People’s Republic of Albania), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 4.
4. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2003, p. 161.
5. ICC, Situation in the State of Palestine, ICC-01/18, Decision on Israel’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court Pursuant to Article 19(2) of the Rome Statute, 21 November 2024.
6. ICC, Situation in the State of Palestine, ICC-01/18, Decision on Israel’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court Pursuant to Article 19(2) of the Rome Statute, 21 November 2024.
- Documents
1. Amnesty International. Sanctions and their Impact on Human Rights. March 2021. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2021/03/sanctions-impact- human-rights.
3. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 8: The relationship between economic sanctions and respect for economic, social and cultural rights, E/C.12/1997/8, 12 June 2007.
4. Douhan, Elena I. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights. UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/45/7, 24 June 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/en/ documents/thematic-reports/ahrc457-report-negative-impact-unilateral-coercive-measures-priorities
5. Human Rights Watch. Sanctions and Human Rights: A Humanitarian Perspective. July 2022. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/07/sanctions- and-human-rights-humanitarian-perspective.
1.6. Human Rights Watch. The Impact of Sanctions on Medical Supplies in Iran and Syria. 2018. https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/medical-sanctions- iran-syria.
7. Human Rights Watch. Unilateral Sanctions and Human Rights. 2019. https://www.hrw.org/topic/unilateral-sanctions.
8. Human Rights Watch. Accountability and Documentation of International Law Violations. 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/06/23/accountability
9. ICJ. Enhancing the Effectiveness of International Human Rights Mechanisms. 2022. https://www.icj.org/enhancing-effectiveness-mechanisms
10. IUSCT, Annual Report 2020. https://www.iusct.net
11. OHCHR. Human Rights and International Solidarity. 2024. https://www.ohchr.org/en/international-solidarity
12. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 36, CRC/C/GC/36, 3 September 2020. https://www.refworld.org/ docid/5f5f4e1f4.htm
13. Douhan, Elena I., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/45/7, 24 June 2020.
14. “Strengthening the Independence and Effectiveness of the International Judiciary”, UNGA Res 68/125, UN Doc. A/RES/68/125, 18 December 2013.
15. United Nations Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 36 on Article 6 of the ICCPR, CCPR/C/GC/36, September 2018.
16. United Nations CESCR, General Comment No. 8, E/C.12/1997/8 (1997). https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaty-bodies/cescr
17. United Nations Human Rights Council. “Strong Push Back Against U.S. Sanctions on the International Criminal Court,” joint statement by ICJ, IBAHRI, HRW, delivered at the 59th session (July 11, 2025).
18. World Bank, ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules, accessed August 2025, https://icsid.worldbank.org/resources/rules.
19. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Constitution of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, accessed August 2025, https://pca-cpa.org/en/about/pca-constitution-and-rules.
