مجله حقوقی بین المللی

مجله حقوقی بین المللی

The Rough jurisdiction of the ICC with regard to Israel's aggression against Iran (13 June, 2025)

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده
Ph.D in International Law, Visiting Lecturer at the Department of Law in Jahrom University and Judge of the Court of Justice.
10.22066/cilamag.2026.2069842.2797
چکیده
The extensive aerial operation and armed attack by Israel against Iran on the 23rd Khordad 1404 [corresponding to June 13, 2025] may be characterized as a violation of the fundamental principle prohibiting the use of force, constituting an act and crime of aggression. Beyond other legal dimensions of the act of aggression, the purpose of this article is to examine the complex issue of the possible jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over the alleged committed crime, as well as the jurisdictional challenges facing this institution. While Iran's legal system lacks an appropriate normative and structural mechanism for applying complementarity jurisdiction concerning core international crimes, including the crime of aggression, the non-membership of both Iran and Israel in the ICC, the lack of willingness by Security Council (SC) to refer the situation to the ICC, and normative deficiencies regarding the acceptance of ad hoc declaration ( per article 12(3) of the Rome Statute) by Iran, render the ICC's exercise of jurisdiction difficult and even impossible. A question can be raised in this regard, does the ICC possess jurisdiction, pursuant to the principle of complementarity, to adjudicate upon the act of aggression committed by Israel against Iran? This article, after recounting the events, descriptively and analytically examines the possibility of the ICC exercising jurisdiction in light of trigger mechanism. Ultimately, it demonstrates that the ICC's jurisdiction is confronted with numerous and particular challenges, thus rendering it unable to exercise jurisdiction; an issue that both highlights the necessity of criminalizing core international crimes within domestic law of Iran, and indicates the fundamental reforms to the ICC's Statute, particularly concerning the role of the SC in activating the ICC's jurisdiction.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Rough jurisdiction of the ICC with regard to Israel's aggression against Iran (13 June, 2025)

نویسنده English

Mahdi Reza Sadeghi
Ph.D in International Law, Visiting Lecturer at the Department of Law in Jahrom University and Judge of the Court of Justice.
چکیده English

The extensive aerial operation and armed attack by Israel against Iran on the 23rd Khordad 1404 [corresponding to June 13, 2025] may be characterized as a violation of the fundamental principle prohibiting the use of force, constituting an act and crime of aggression. Beyond other legal dimensions of the act of aggression, the purpose of this article is to examine the complex issue of the possible jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over the alleged committed crime, as well as the jurisdictional challenges facing this institution. While Iran's legal system lacks an appropriate normative and structural mechanism for applying complementarity jurisdiction concerning core international crimes, including the crime of aggression, the non-membership of both Iran and Israel in the ICC, the lack of willingness by Security Council (SC) to refer the situation to the ICC, and normative deficiencies regarding the acceptance of ad hoc declaration ( per article 12(3) of the Rome Statute) by Iran, render the ICC's exercise of jurisdiction difficult and even impossible. A question can be raised in this regard, does the ICC possess jurisdiction, pursuant to the principle of complementarity, to adjudicate upon the act of aggression committed by Israel against Iran? This article, after recounting the events, descriptively and analytically examines the possibility of the ICC exercising jurisdiction in light of trigger mechanism. Ultimately, it demonstrates that the ICC's jurisdiction is confronted with numerous and particular challenges, thus rendering it unable to exercise jurisdiction; an issue that both highlights the necessity of criminalizing core international crimes within domestic law of Iran, and indicates the fundamental reforms to the ICC's Statute, particularly concerning the role of the SC in activating the ICC's jurisdiction.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Israel aggression
Iran
ICC
complementarity jurisdiction
Security Council
References
- Books
1.         Bosco, David, Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court In A World of Power Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
2.         Cherif Bassiouni, M., Introduction to International Criminal Law: 2nd Revised ed. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff publisher, 2014.
3.         Crawford J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
4.         Hartig, Annegret, Making Aggression A Crime Under Domestic Law on the Legislative, Implementation of Article 8bis of the ICC Statute, The Hague, Springer, 2023.
5.         McDougall Carrie, The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
6.         Sadeghi, Mahdi Reza, International Criminal Justice System: Structure, Deficiencies and Challenges, Tehran: the SD Institute of Law, 2022 (In Persian).
7.         Stigen, Jo, The relationship between the international criminal court and national jurisdiction, Boston: Nijhoff, Leiden., 2008.
8.         Wong, M.S. The Crime of Aggression and Public International Law, The Netherlands: Leiden University, 2016.
9.         Zimmermann, Andreas and Elisa Freiburg, “Article 8bis, crime of aggression”, in The Rome Statute of the international criminal court A Commentary, 3rd ed. Triffterer/Ambos (eds), 579-618, Nomos, C.H.Beck. Hart, 2016.
 
- Articles
1.         Akande, Dapo and Sangeeta Shah, “Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts”, The European Journal of International Law, 21 no 4 (2011).
2.         Tzanakopoulos, Antonios and Dapo Akande, “The Crime of Aggression in the ICC and State Responsibility”, Harvard International Law Journal 58, (2017).
3.         Wood, Michael, “International law and the use of force: what happens in practice?” Indian journal of international law53, (2013).
4.         Sharifi, Tarazkohi Hossein, Victor Barin Chaharbakhsh, “Preventive Self-Defence In 21st Century”, Public Law Studies Quartery 40, (2013).
5.          Schaeffer, Robert, “The Audacity of Compromise: The UN Security Council and the Pre-conditions to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by the ICC with Regard to the Crime of Aggression”, International Criminal Law Review 9 (2009).
6.         Stein Mark S, “The security council, the international criminal court, and the crime of aggression: How exclusive is the security council's power to determine aggression?” IND. INT’L & COMP. L. REV. 16, 1(2005).
7.         Najandymanesh, Heybatollah, Bazzar Vahid, “The Complementary Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression”, Teaching of Criminal Law no14 (2017). (In persion)
8.         Getgen, Kestenbaum, Jocelyn, “Closing Impunity Gaps for the Crime of Aggression”, Chicago Journal of International Law17, no 1 (2016).
9.         Heinsch, Robert, “The Crime of Aggression After Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?” GoJIL 2, 714 (2010).
10.     Reisinger, Coracini Astrid, “The International Criminal Court’s Exercise of Jurisdiction Over the Crime of Aggression – at Last … in Reach … Over Some”, Goettingen Journal of International Law 2 (2010).
11.     Jurdia, Nidal Nabil, “the Domestic Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression After the International Criminal Court Review Conference: Possibilities and Alternatives”, Melbourne Journal of International Law 14 (2013).
12.     Soderbaum, Fredrik and Hettne Bjorn, “The UN and Regional Organizations in Global Security: Competing or Complementary Logics?” Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 12, no. 3 (2006).
13.     Stahn, Carsten, “The End, the Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of Aggression”, Leiden journal of international law 23 (2010).
14.     Trahan, Jennifer, “Legal Issues Surrounding Veto Use and Aggression”, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 55 (2023).
15.     Khorshidi, Attar Mohammad and seyed Hesamadin Lesani, “A Critical View Toward US Claim of Preemptive Self-Defense in the Assassination of General Qasem Soleimani”, Iranian Journal of International and Comparative Law 1, no. 1 (2023) (In persion).
 
- Cases
1.         Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), judgment of 14 February 2002.
2.         Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Iran v United states of America) ICJ Reports, 2003.
3.         ICC, Decision on the admissibility of the case against Abdullah Al-Senussi, pre-trial chamber I, No, ICC/01/11-01/11, 11 October 2013, para. 66 (iv).
4.         Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, of 9 July 2004.
 
- Instruments
1.         Annex III, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala 31 May – 11 June 2010
2.         Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights.
3.         Rome Statute
4.         UN Charter
 
- Documents
1.         Challenges in prosecuting the crime of aggression: jurisdiction and immunities, Advisory report no. 40, Advisory committee on international public law, 12 September 2022.
2.         General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974.
3.         ILC, Commentary to the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind, in: Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1996, Vol. II.
4.         ILC, Report of the Seventy-third session, UN Doc. 10 (2022).
5.         International Law Commission (2017b) Report on the Work of its Sixty-Ninth Session, UN Doc. A/72/10.
6.         International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Forty-Eighth Session, UN GAOR, 51st sess, Supp No 10, UN Doc A/51/10 (1996).
7.         Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its forty-sixth session, 2 May -22 July 1994, Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-ninth session, Supplement, No. 10.
8.         Security Council meets in emergency session over Iran-Israel conflict, amid strikes and counterstrikes, https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/ 1164401.
9.         The crime of aggression in the national laws of EU Member States, Genocide Network Observer States and Ukraine, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. Availbe at: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/genocide-network, last accessed August 24, 2025.
10.     The Islamic Penal Code of Iran
11.     The law on countering the hostile activities of Zionist Regime against peace and security.
12.     The Prof. Claus Kreß's remark at the Seminar on the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine – 10 April 2024, available at: https://rm.coe.int/keynote-kress/1680af5a2d, last accessed August, 21, 2025.
13.     UN Doc S/2022/155 (25 February 2022).
14.     UN experts condemn Israeli attack on Iran and urge end to hostilities, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/06/un-experts-condemn-israeli-attack-iran-and-urge-end-hostilities, 20 June 2025.
15.     Understandings regarding the amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on the Crime of Aggression, Annex III, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala 31 May – 11 June 2010, Available at: http//crimeofaggression.info/documents
 
- Online Sources
1.         Elements of crimes, article 8bis, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/ sites/default/files/Publications/Elements-of Crimes.pdf.
3.         ICC Judges amend the Regulations of the Court in connection with the activation of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-judges-amend-regulations-court-connection- activation-jurisdiction-over-crime-aggression, 15 November 2018.
4.         Iran’s Leader urges legal action over recent Israel-US aggression, praises national resolve, available at: https://ifpnews.com/iran-leader-legal-action- israel-us-aggression-national-resolve/
5.         Legal action against US-Israeli aggression underway: Iran deputy FM, july 30, 2025 available at: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/516254/ Legal-action-against-US-Israeli-aggression-underway-Iran-deputy.
6.         Netanyahu says regime change in Iran could be result of Israel's attacks, available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/netanyahu-says- regime-change-iran-could-be-result-israels-attacks-2025-06-15.
7.         OIC condemns US Israeli attacks on Iran calls for UN action, available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkiye/oic-condemns-us-israeli-attacks-on- Iran-calls-for-un-action/3608858, 22.6.25, last accessed August 30, 2025.
8.         Operation Rising Lion: Israel's PM Announces Targeted Preemptive Airstrikes in Iran, available at: https://www.americanrhetoric.com/ speeches/benjaminnetanyahuiranairstrikes.
9.         Shane, Darcy Shane, “Aggression by P5 Security Council Members: Time for ICC Referrals by the General Assembly”, JUST SECURITY (Mar. 16, 2022), at: https://www.justsecurity.org/80686/aggression-by-p5- securitycouncil-members-time-for-icc-referrals-by-the-general-assembly/
10.     Two-state solution will never lead to sustainable peace in region: Iran FM, available at: https://nournews.ir/en/news/194783/Two-state-solution- will-never-lead-to-sustainable-peace-in-region-Iran-FM, published date 10/19/2024.

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 بهمن 1404